UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2285
JESSIE FOGGIE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SEARS ROEBUCK AND COMPANY; MARK TESTMAN,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
LINDA HERRING; ROBERT SHORD; JIM WHITE; VOLLIE
DYER; DAVID WILKINS; JANE SMITH; KEIR SUTTON;
DELORES TAYLOR,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-00-496-8)
Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: February 27, 2001
Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jessie Foggie, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Floyd Fisher, Anna Maria
Darwin, JACKSON, LEWIS, SCHNITZLER & KRUPMAN, Greenville, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Jessie Foggie appeals from the district court's order denying
her motion for reconsideration filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
59(e). Our review of the record discloses that this appeal is
without merit. Foggie’s motion for reconsideration does not demon-
strate that her underlying action was improperly dismissed. We
therefore find that the district court's denial of her Rule 59(e)
motion was not an abuse of discretion,* and affirm the district
court’s order on the reasoning of the district court. Foggie v.
Sears Roebuck & Co., No. CA-00-496-8 (D.S.C. Aug. 30, 2000). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
United States v. Williams, 674 F.2d 310, 312 (4th Cir.
1982).
2