Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Construction Co.

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1189 MICHAEL T. MASUOKA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus G. W. MURPHY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INCORPORATED; 1-5 JOHN DOES, Entities; JANE DOES, 1-5 Entities; DOES CORPORATION, 1-5 entities; DOES PARTNERSHIP, 1-5 Entities; JOHN DOES, 1-5 Governmental Entities; JANE DOES, 1- 5 Governmental Entities, Defendants - Appellees, versus ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.; KENNETH T. GOYA, Insurance Agent, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-829-AM) Submitted: April 11, 2002 Decided: July 8, 2002 Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael T. Masuoka, Appellant Pro Se. Mark David Crawford, FRIEDLANDER, MISLER, FRIEDLANDER, SLOAN & HERZ, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Michael T. Masuoka appeals the district court’s order denying his “motion for independent action to vacate and set aside the judgments filed on February 14th and 21st.” We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Construction Co., No. CA-00-829-AM (E.D. Va. Jan. 9, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2