UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2132
VICTOR J. MOTTLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CITY OF RICHMOND, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY;
COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY OF RICHMOND;
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL’S
OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CA-02-483-3)
Submitted: January 29, 2003 Decided: February 25, 2003
Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Judge Widener wrote a
concurring opinion.
Victor J. Mottley, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Augustine Lukanuski,
Keith Allen May, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Richmond, Virginia; John
Adrian Gibney, Jr., SHUFORD, RUBIN & GIBNEY, Richmond, Virginia;
George Walerian Chabalewski, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Victor Mottley appeals the district court’s orders granting
Appellees’ motions to dismiss Mottley’s civil action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mottley v. City
of Richmond, No. CA-02-483-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 26 & 30, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.1
AFFIRMED
1
Tracy W. J. Thorne, formerly an Assistant Commonwealth’s
Attorney and a defendant in this case, is currently employed as a
staff attorney in the Office of Staff Counsel for this Court. Mr.
Thorne has not participated in any way in the processing or
consideration of this appeal.
2
WIDENER, Circuit Judge, concurring:
While I concur in the opinion of the court, in view of
footnote l, left to my own devices, I would publish this opinion.
3