been absent from her life, and the court determined that termination of
appellant's parental rights was in the child's best interest. See NRS
128.105(1).
Having considered the appellate record, we conclude that
substantial evidence supports the district court's order terminating
appellant's parental rights. See In re of Parental Rights as to D.R.H., 120
Nev. 422, 428, 92 P.3d 1230, 1234 (2004). Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'
' J.
Hardesty
Parraguirre
J.
cc: Hon. Robert Teuton, District Judge, Family Court Division
Philip J.T.
Kainen Law Group, PLLC
Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg
Eighth District Court Clerk
'Appellant has filed a request for the preparation of the transcript.
We have determined that the transcript is unnecessary to make a decision
in this matter. Appellant has also filed a motion for permission to file
briefs. Having concluded that appellant's civil appeal statement is
sufficient to address the merits of this appeal, we deny appellant's motion.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A
WEIN DMIIIROME1