NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
__________________________
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., AND
HONEYWELL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES,
INC.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee.
__________________________
2008-5181
__________________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal
Claims in 02-CV-1909, Judge Susan G. Braden.
__________________________
ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING
__________________________
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL v. US 2
Before MAYER, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM
ORDER
Combined petitions for panel rehearing and rehearing
en banc were filed by the appellees. A response was
invited by the panel and filed by Honeywell International,
Inc. That was followed by L-3 Communications Corpora-
tion’s Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support of its
Petition for Rehearing.
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) L-3’s Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support of
its Petition for Rehearing is granted.
(2) Appellees’ petitions for panel rehearing are
granted for the limited purposes of revising por-
tions of the discussion of the Invention Secrecy Act
and to properly limit the scope of remand.
(3) The previous opinion in this appeal issued Febru-
ary 18, 2010 and reported at Honeywell Int’l, Inc. v.
U.S., 596 F.3d 800 (Fed. Cir. 2010) is withdrawn
and replaced with the revised opinion accompany-
ing this order.
The petitions for rehearing en banc will be circulated
to the full court along with a copy of this order.
FOR THE COURT
May 25, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk
cc: Lawrence J. Gotts, Esq.
John W. Harbin, Esq.
Thomas J. Madden, Esq.
Christopher L. Crumbley, Esq.