UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7287
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
DAVID CHARLES MCCLINTON,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
District Judge. (3:89-cr-00098-FDW-1)
Submitted: January 28, 2011 Decided: February 23, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Charles McClinton, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Magee Tompkins,
United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Charles McClinton appeals the district court’s
order construing McClinton’s petition for a writ of error coram
nobis as a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion and
denying it as successive and unauthorized. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
McClinton, No. 3:89-cr-00098-FDW-1 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2010). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2