United States v. Jesus Jimenez-Leon

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 12 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-10040 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:13-cr-00465-RCC v. MEMORANDUM* JESUS JIMENEZ-LEON, a.k.a. Jesus Jimenez-Garcia, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, Chief Judge, Presiding Submitted December 9, 2014** Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. Jesus Jimenez-Leon appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the below-Guidelines sentence of 39 months and three days imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C) and 846, possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Jimenez-Leon contends that the district court erred by failing to consider and explain why it rejected his arguments for a larger downward variance under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). We review for plain error, see United States v. Valencia- Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and find none. The record reflects that the district court considered Jimenez-Leon’s mitigating arguments and explained the sentence adequately. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992- 93 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). AFFIRMED. 2 14-10040