TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-97-00111-CR
NO. 45,529, HONORABLE HOWARD S. WARNER, II, JUDGE PRESIDING
John Greenwood appeals from the county court at law's denial of habeas corpus relief. Tex. R. App. P. 44. In a single point of error, appellant contends the court erred by holding that an administrative driver's license suspension does not serve as a double jeopardy bar to his prosecution for driving while intoxicated.
Following his arrest, appellant refused a request that he submit to a test for alcohol concentration. As a consequence, appellant's driver's license was suspended for ninety days. Tex. Transp. Code Ann. ch. 724 (West 1996). Appellant contends that the suspension of his driver's license constituted punishment for driving while intoxicated and bars further prosecution under the Double Jeopardy Clause. U.S. Const. amend. V. This contention has been considered and rejected by both this Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals in opinions discussing the same authorities on which appellant relies. Tharp v. State, 935 S.W.2d 157 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Ex parte Arnold, 916 S.W.2d 640 (Tex. App.--Austin 1996, pet. ref'd). For the reasons stated in Tharp and Arnold, the administrative suspension of appellant's driver's license does not bar his prosecution for driving while intoxicated under the Double Jeopardy Clause.
We overrule the point of error and affirm the order denying habeas corpus relief.
Before Justices Powers, Jones and Kidd
Affirmed
Filed: May 1, 1997
Do Not Publish