in Re Jim McPherson Sherrie McPherson Diversified Laborers, Inc. Coastal Terminal Operators, Inc. Coastal Stevedoring Corporation And Jacintoport Corporatoion

Related Cases

40 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1500, 40 Fair empl.prac.cas. 968, 40 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 36,323 Deborah Taylor Golden, Cydney Claire Bradford, Bobbie Ann Gilmore, Molleen Ivicevich, Gayle M. James, Marian Knight, Elaine Todd, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Similarly Situated Individuals, and Charles Bower, Norman Finn, John Moreno, Harold D. Olson, Frank E. Woodruff and Norman H. Gottlieb, Plaintiffs-Intervenors/appellants v. Pacific Maritime Association International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union, Local 63 International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union Local 13, International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union, Defendants
California United Terminals v. Sandra Towne
Barbara Cramer James J. Achterhof James P. Bebermeyer Gary W. Bleyer Lensowrth Cottrell, Jr. James E. Crowley Alan P. Damiano Laura Daniel Marlene A. Epley Marta S. Goff Lloyd R. Hagan Vicki Peters Deborah L. Roeske Al Rollins James E. Schmid Larry Sutter v. George G. Matish, Director (Class Action) International Union, Uaw Uaw, Local 600
Marvin Kaylor Bert Nickerson Victor Perez, Jr. Robert Perez Jim Manning Don Vargas Jerry Vargas Frank P. Mihic John Ryder Kenneth Clark Victor Perez Jim Valjalo and Richard Waldie v. Crown Zellerbach, Inc., a Corporation, Western Truck Manpower, Inc., a Corporation Universal Coordinators, Inc., a Corporation Alltrans California Express, a Corporation Teamsters Local 70 Van-Ward Services, a Corporation
Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00264-CV

In re Jim McPherson; Sherrie McPherson; Diversified Laborers, Inc.; Coastal Terminal Operators, Inc.; Coastal Stevedoring Corporation; and Jacintoport Corporation

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion to stay trial court proceedings pending the outcome of the petition for writ of mandamus. The emergency motion to stay trial court proceedings is overruled. The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Yeakel and Puryear

Filed: May 23, 2003