In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-09-00027-CV
______________________________
IN RE:
TIMOTHY WAYNE NELSON
Original Mandamus Proceeding
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Timothy Wayne Nelson has filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting this Court to
order the Honorable Amy M. Smith, the presiding judge of the County Court at Law of Hopkins
County, Texas, to issue an order vacating her order dismissing his petition of divorce. In a prior
appeal, this Court had granted Nelson a new trial pursuant to TEX . R. APP . P. 34.6(f) because,
through no fault of the appellant, the record could not be prepared. See In re Marriage of Nelson,
No. 06-08-00090-CV, 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 8308 (Tex. App.—Texarkana Nov. 5, 2008, no pet.)
(mem. op.). The trial court's order of dismissal states that the case was dismissed because Brenda
Kay Nelson has died since this Court's opinion was issued.
Mandamus issues only when the mandamus record establishes 1) a clear abuse of discretion
or the violation of a duty imposed by law and 2) the absence of a clear and adequate remedy at law.
Cantu v. Longoria, 878 S.W.2d 131 (Tex. 1994); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex.
1992). "The general rule in Texas is that a cause of action for divorce is purely personal and
becomes moot and abates upon the death of either spouse." Palomino v. Palomino, 960 S.W.2d 899,
900 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1997, pet. denied); McKenzie v. McKenzie, 667 S.W.2d 568, 571 (Tex.
App.—Dallas 1984, no writ); Garrison v. Garrison, 568 S.W.2d 709, 710 (Tex. Civ.
App.—Beaumont 1978, no writ). Absent certain exceptions not present here, "[t]he proper
procedural disposition of a divorce action when one of the parties dies is dismissal." See Whatley
v. Bacon, 649 S.W.2d 297, 299 (Tex. 1983) (orig. proceeding); Palomino, 960 S.W.2d at 900. Due
2
to the death of Brenda Kay Nelson, the divorce proceedings are now moot. Because the trial court
correctly dismissed the suit, the record does not establish a clear abuse of discretion.
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
Jack Carter
Justice
Date Submitted: March 10, 2009
Date Decided: March 11, 2009
3