Citgo Refining and Marketing, Inc. and Citgo Petroleum Corporation v. Amelia Garza









NUMBER 13-03-00267-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG




CITGO REFINING AND MARKETING, INC.

AND CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION, Appellants,



v.



AMELIA GARZA, ET AL., Appellees.


On appeal from the 28th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.




MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides (1)

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellants and appellees have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. On March 23, 2006, this Court issued an opinion reversing the trial court's judgment and remanding the case for further proceedings. See Citgo Ref. & Mktg. v. Garza, 187 S.W.3d 45, 65-66 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 2006, pet. dism'd). The parties subsequently filed cross-petitions for review with the Texas Supreme Court, which were ultimately abated and dismissed because the parties negotiated and secured a settlement.

Because of the parties' settlement of this case, appellants and appellees request that the Court now dismiss this appeal and issue mandate accordingly.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, costs will be taxed against the party incurring same. See id. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Our mandate will issue forthwith reflecting the dismissal of the appeal as stated herein. Pursuant to Rule 42.1(c), our opinion previously issued on March 23, 2006, is not withdrawn. See id. 42.1(c).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 14th day of August, 2008.













1. This matter was originally assigned to a panel consisting of Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Castillo. The Honorable Federico Hinojosa and the Honorable Errlinda Castillo, former Justices of this Court, did not participate in this memorandum opinion because their terms of office expired on December 31, 2006.