NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SEP 17 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-10379
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00982-DGC-1
v.
MEMORANDUM*
AMBROSIO NUNEZ-LOPEZ, a.k.a.
Ambrosio Nunez,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 15, 2015**
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Ambrosio Nunez-Lopez appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges his conviction and 120-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with
intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine, in violation of 21
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and 841(b)(1)(A)(viii). Pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), Nunez-Lopez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are
no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We
have provided Nunez-Lopez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No
pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Nunez-Lopez has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence.
Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal
waivers, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88
(9th Cir. 2009).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
2