USCA1 Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
_________________________
No. 94-1761
MADELEINE O. ROBINSON,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
ROOSEVELT BENTON, ETC., ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
_________________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
[Hon. Raymond J. Pettine, Senior U.S. District Judge] __________________________
_________________________
Before
Boudin, Circuit Judge, _____________
Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, ____________________
and Stahl, Circuit Judge. _____________
_________________________
David J. Barend, with whom Barend, Heartquist & Hurley was _______________ ____________________________
on brief, for appellant.
Patricia K. Rocha, with whom Adler, Pollock & Sheehan was on _________________ ________________________
brief, for appellees.
_________________________
_______________________
Per Curiam. Having carefully reviewed the record in Per Curiam. __________
this case, along with the arguments contained in the parties'
briefs, we are fully persuaded that this appeal presents no
substantial question of law or fact. Consequently, we affirm the
judgment below for substantially the reasons set forth in the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lovegreen dated May
20, 1994 (adopted and approved by the district court on June 24,
1994, following de novo review). __ ____
Affirmed. See 1st Cir. R. 27.1. ________ ___
2