Norman Crittenden v. Joseph Flores and Margaret Flores

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 8, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-13-00465-CV NORMAN CRITTENDEN, Appellant V. JOSEPH FLORES AND MARGARET FLORES, Appellee On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1020693 MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an attempted appeal from a judgment signed February 6, 2013. A motion for new trial was filed March 4, 2013. Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed May 28, 2013. When appellant has filed a timely motion for new trial, the notice of appeal must be filed within ninety days after the date the judgment is signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a). Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed timely. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1, but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617-18 (1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed within the fifteen-day period provided by Rule 26.3 On July 9, 2013, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant’s response fails to demonstrate that this Court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Brown, Christopher, and McCally. 2