United States v. DelValle

Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-9-2004 USA v. DelValle Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 03-4431 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004 Recommended Citation "USA v. DelValle" (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 507. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/507 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2004 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. NOT PRECEDENTIAL IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT NO. 03-4431 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSE DELVALLE Appellant On Appeal From the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Crim. Action No. 03-cr-00230-1) District Judge: Hon. Legrome D. Davis Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) July 1, 2004 BEFORE: AM BRO, ALDISERT and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges (Opinion Filed: July 9, 2004) OPINION OF THE COURT STAPLETON, Circuit Judge: Appellant Jose DelValle pled guilty to distribution of crack cocaine. He was sentenced to twenty months of incarceration. On appeal, he argues only that the District Court “erred in not granting a downward departure on the grounds that this case departed from the ‘heartland’ of the sentencing guidelines.” Appellant’s Br/ at 8. As appellant acknowledges, the District Court recognized that it had the authority to depart. It necessarily follows that we lack jurisdiction to review its decision not to depart. United States v. Vitale, 159 F.3d 810 (3d Cir. 1998); United States v. Denardi, 892 F.2d 269 (3d Cir. 1989). The appeal will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 2