I)ISN1 ISS: Opinion flied October 2. 2012
In The
uf 41I1ra1l
QLfl11t
FiftIj 1itrirt nf tixai at a11a
No. 054 2-00598CV
RING() I)RILIJNG I, L.P., Appellant
V.
VICTORY DRILLING, INC., Appellee
On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-Ii-14896
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices O’Neill, FitzG erald,and Lang-Miers
Opinion By Justice O’Neill
Before the Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant informs the Court
that the accelerated appeal is now moot. Accordingly, we grant appellant’s nyition and dismiss the
appeal. See TEX. R. App. P. 42.! (a)( 1).
LLJILL
JUSTICE /
1205 98F.P05
Q..L1IrL tL _\p’etk.
fift1i Ji
Irirt tf Ltct t1 JaLIa;
1
JUDGMENT
RING() I)RILl1NCi I, I..P .,Appellant Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court
of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. DC-i I -
No. O5-12-O5)8-CV V. 14896).
Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill, Justices
VICTORY DRILLING, INC., Appellee FitzGerald and Lang..Miers, participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is I)JStiJISSEI).
It is ORDEREI) that appeilee, Victory Drilling, Inc., recover its costs of the appeal from
appellant, Ringo Drillmz I L P
J udgment entered October 2, 20! 2,