Omar Arellano Zarate v. Loretta E. Lynch

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 29 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OMAR ARELLANO ZARATE, No. 13-73083 Petitioner, Agency No. A077-160-480 v. MEMORANDUM* LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted February 24, 2016 ** Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges. Omar Arellano Zarate, a native of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). substantial evidence the BIA’s factual findings, Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for review. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of Arellano Zarate’s CAT claim because he failed to establish it is more likely than not that he would be tortured. See Zheng v. Holder, 644 F.3d 829, 835-36 (9th Cir. 2011). In light of our conclusion, we need not reach Arellano Zarate’s contention regarding acquiescence. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 2 13-73083