Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Hon. A. J. (Jack) Hartel Opinion No. PI-671 County Attorney Liberty County Courthouse Re: Whether a aothcr May h Liberty, Texas promoted to tax asscssor- collector of a s.chooldis- trict when her son is a member of the board of such district without violating Article 132, Vernon's Penal Dear Mr. liartel: Code. Tour recent letter to-this office requesting an opinion concerning the referenced matter states, in part, as follows: "The Hardin Independent School District ha8 had in its continuous employ, Mrs. A. E. Cessna, for the past six (6) years as Assistant Tax Assessor-Collector. This past April (1970) Mrs. Cessna’s son was elected to serve on the Board of Education of the Hardin Independent School District . . . 'The Hardin Independent School District would like to promote Mrs. Cessna to the'job of Tax Assessor-Collector . . . "The question has been raised by a tax- payer in the Hardin Independent School District as to whether this would be a violation of Article 432 of the Penal Code, pertaining to nepotimn . . . *. . . . "I would appreciate your opinion as to whether the above-mentioned fact situation would constitute a violation of Article 132 of the Penal Code . . ." lion.A. J. (Jack) Hartel, page 3 (M-671) hold their employment, or to office which might give rise but for this amendatory Act to a conflict with the nepotism laws of this State or some municipal corportition;the fact that persons who have continuously served in public office and employment in this State prior to the election to some office of a relative should not be discharged for that reason alone: and the fact that the purpose of the nepotism law was not to oust such persons frcm legitimate employ- ment in this State, create an emergency and an imperative public necessity that the Constitutional Rule requiring all bills to be read on three revere1 days in each House be and the mama is hereby suspendedt and this Act shall take effect and be in force froa and after its passage: and it is so enacted." Acts 52nd Leg. R.S. 1951, ch. 97, p. 159. It is clear that the party involved in the instant fact situation may remain in her position as Assistant Tax Assessor-Collector, despite the fact that her son is on the school board, by virtue of the underscored provisions of the Article. What is at issue here is whether her promotion to a higher position, within the same office, would be allowable as being within the language of the Article relating to "such of- fice, position, clerkship, employment or duty.' The statement of legislative purpose quoted in Section 3 of the Act, supra, evidences that the,underscored provisions of the Article were added to prevent a person's losing his job solely because a relative within,the prohibited degree had been elected to another public position. It is our opinion that the Legislature intended by the underscored language of the Article, supra, only that a person would not lose his job if a relative were elected to an office within the Article's purview. We cannot conclude that the Legislature, in view of the spirit of the other provisions of the Article, intended that a relative of such &n officeholder could be promoted to & position whereby his financial remuneration would be enhanced. In view of the foregoing, your question is answered in the affirmative. -x03- Hon. A. 3. (Jack) Hartel, page 2 (M-671) Article 432, Vernon's Penal Codi, provides dad follows: 'No officer of this State nor any officer of any district county, city, precinct, school district, or any other municipal subdivision of this State, nor 4ny officer or member of any State district, county, city, school district or other municipal board, or judge of any court, created by or under authority of any General or Special;Law of this State, nor any member of the &egislature, shall appoint, or vote for, or con- firm the appointment of any office, position, clerkship, employment or duty, of any person ,,relatedwithin the second degree by affinity or ~within the third degree by consanguinity to the .person so appointing or so voting, or to any other member of any such board, the Legislature, or court of which such person so appointing or ,voting may be a member, when the salary, fees, or compensation or such appointee is to be paid for, directly or indirectly, out.of or from public funds or fees of office of any kind or character appointing, voting for, or confirming,the an- pointment, or to the election or appointment Of the officer or member related to such employee In the prohibited degree." (Emphasis added.) Section 3 of the Act amending Article 432, supra, to include the above underscored prwisionr therein, atates that the reasons the Article was so amended were as follows: *The fact that numerous employees of the State and its agencies and subdivisions whose services are valuable to the State are .required to give up such employment because members of their family may be; from time to ~timc, elected to office in this State, under whom such employees -3LOL- Hon. A. J. (Jack) Hartel, Page 4 (M-671) Pursuant to Article 432, Vernon’8 Penal Code, a mother, currently employed as assistant .taxassessor-collectorof a school dirtrict, ruy not be promoted to the positionof tax assessor- Prepared by Austin C. Bray, Jr. Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMJUTTEE Kerns Taylor, Chairman W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman John Grace Bob Flowers Bob Lattimore Arthur Ssndlin I4EADEF. GRIFFIN Staff Legal Assistant ALIRE WALKER Executive Assistant NOLAWHITE First Assistant -3204.