Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Honorable J. R. Owen Opinion'hro. C-209 county Attorney Williamson County RR: Whether Wesleyan Home is exempt - Qeorgetown, Texas from ad valorem taxation as an Institutionof purely public charity. Dear Mr. Owen: You have requested an opinion from this Department as to whether or not Wesleyan Home, an Institutionoperated by a~non-profit corporation in which there is made no gain or profit, is exempt from ad valorem taxes. The following is taken from your request: "The cost of keeping each resident is $130.00 per month for the services rendered. The Home figures that it will coat that amount to maintain each resident. If the resident is financiallyable to pay such amount, he does so. However, If he is not able financially to pay this amount, he is not denied admlaaion. As mentioned In my letter of December 13, some of the residents derive their sole income from Social Security and Texas Old Age Assistance. In this latter situation, the resident8 do not receive enough from these sources to pay the entire 150.00. Since it coats the Home at least t150.00 per month to maintain this resident, it is necessary that his monthly contribution be supplementedfrom some source. The source to supplementthis is the Benevolent Edegn;:zned In my lett,erof December 13. if the resident has a monthly income of $iOO to pay forhis upkeep, then the additional $50.00 per month which It actually takes to keep him up is taken from thle Benevolent Fund and used by the Home for the benefit of thie resident. This Benevolent Fund was established for such pur- pose, that la, to have some money available -lOlO- T - Honorable J. R. Owen, Page 2 (Opinion No. C-209) to be used on behalf of a resident of the Home whose financial ability to pay was leas than the actual coat to the Home of providing him with board, room, linens, laundry,.health services,etc. '"rheofficials of the Home advise that some of their residents are either entirely or partially charity cases. Some have no personal source'of Income at all, but must rely entirely upon the funds received by them from the governmentalagencies and from the Benevolent Fund mentioned above which is comprised of money donated to and solicited by the Home from individuals,churches, and sunday school classes to aaalat in this charitablework. The officials also state that a person will not be denied admission to the Home simply because he la unable to pay anything for room, meals and clinic service, and even though he must depend upon 100 percent charity for his support and maintenance." Article VIII, Section 2 of the Texas Constitutionauthor- lzea,the Legislaturetd exempt from taxation property used exclusivelyand reasonably necessary in conducting lnatltutlona of,purely public charity. The Supreme Court of Texas in City of Houston vs. Scottish Rite Benevolent Aaaoclatlon,111 Tex. 191, 230 S W 978 (1921) ln.deflnlngan institutionof purely public charity, said: ' "In our opinion, the Legislaturemight reasonably conclude that an lnatltutlonwas one of 'purelypublic charity’ where: First, It made no gain or profit; second, It ac- complished enda wholly benevolent;and third, It benefited persona, indefinite In numbers and peraonaltlea,by preventing them, through absolute gratuity, from becoming burdens to eoclety and to the State." As stated by you In your request for this opinion, It la a fact question as to whether a given organizationcomes wlthln the deflnltlon of a purely public charity. The Ugia&ature, in putting into effect the permission ~grantedby Section 2 of Article VIII of the Constitution, -lOll- Honorable J. R. Owen, Page 3 (Opinion No. C-209) amended Section 7 of Article 7150, V$rnon's Civil Statutes, which amendment purported to exempt . . . all buildings and personal property belonging to Institutionsof purely public charity, together with the lands belonging to and occupied by.auch inst$tutlonsnot leased or otherwise used with a view to profit, . . . ." We are of the opinion that In view of the facts set forth In your request for an opinion, that the Wesleyan Home meets the necessary requirementsset forth by the Court In the Scottish Rite case, supra, and thereby qualifies as an inatltutlonof purely public charity. Therefore, the property of Wesleyan Home which la used exclusivelyby the Home and is reasonably necessary In conducting such institution is ex- empt from ad valorem taxation. Attorney General's opinion c-203. A copy of this opinion Is enclosed for your information. SUMMARY ------- Under the stated facts Wesleyan Home qualifies as an institutionof purely ,publiccharity, and its property which is used exclusively by it and is reasonably necessary in conducting such Institution la exempt from ad valorem taxation.' Very truly yours, WAGGONRR'CARR Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITPER W. V. Geppert, Chairman Marietta Payne Arthur Sandlin Malcolm Qalck Robert Lewis Approved for the Attorney General by: Stanton Stone -1012-