604
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN
ORoVrR SCLLCRS
ATrolMrv QCNRAL
Honorable I. M. Trimble, First Assistant
State Superintendentof Public Xnstruction
Austin, Texas
Dear Sir: opinion Ro. o-7360
Re: Taxation and bon
From the correspond
of August 16,~1946, It app
tiorthhas acquired land fo
geographical bo ndent School
District. The red whether
he City of Fort
Id responsible for
f the district.
e questions we enclose
in vhich the County
rised that an air port
vaa exempt from taxation
in the land purchased for
n addition to the cases cited
on,*your attention ir invited to the
the same subject: Corporation of San
State, 111 Tex. 108, 229 S. U. 845;
S. i. v. City of Bryan, I.43 ter. 348, 184
L. C. B. A. T. Chemical Bank and Tru8t Co.
(Sup. Ct.) 160 S. W. 2d 48; Davis,v'.Burnett, 77 Tex. 3,
13 S. Y. 613; Daugherty V. Thortipcron,
71 Tex. 192, 9 S. Y.
99.
Honorable T. hi.Trlmble, Pago 2
The l aquimiblon of the property within !?avermn
Tnd-rndont School District would not render the City of
-“..-c--
I lart - wth reeponsible for any portion of the echo01 die
-_-_ UC
triat indebtednem, save only to the extent that .the
property acquired might be subject to taxel if used by
the City for other than public purpoeee.
1
Yours very truly
I
-w Gaynor Kendall
Asaiet?.nt
Encloeurr
.