Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

. . .. 513 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN 0cMI.D 0. MAN” ~nxemmv an*maL Honorable Clinton Owalry, Dlm&,or Honorable D~.m&,or cklsUtllltisa Division Railroad Comission of Texae Dsar Sir: We have rsaeivr i reoent date with ou tram the Bioe- President of the 80 the operations of t mm your letter to us a0 folloust latter 0fxapW wa8 p Artlola do50 end asion annual l-0. er irtiole 6056 and me6 reaefptn tuaa t operationa ai Republlo FIatural 4 briefly outlined In their letter dated February S4, 1941 a are enolosing. In l ddltjon to / ained in auoh letter, you am ad- ublia Ratural @aa Oampanpmaker as under oontraat to the Oity oi Oorptaa Ohrleti, Tours, tram the Sax&. baa Field in Nuooes county. The Oitp of Qorpue ~Obrlstlin the owner of the gas pipe lins, rour and one-halt allwu In length, fmm said field to the town border station of the City of Corpus Ohrirrtl, but pay- menta of gas to the I?epublioNatusol GaasCompany Honorable Clinton Owslsy, Page 9 are baaed upon the readlhge a? the town bordsr mater, provided that tha lost and unaaoouuted for gas between the Sisld station meter (In the Saxet Field) and ths town border meter doas not sxoesa 10 per oent. 30 far as has bean deter- Elnsd by this Division, no adjustmenthae aver bean made for lost and unaooountedfor gae in exee8a of 10 per oent. .wRepublloNatural Gas Compan7,ownr,oper- ates, and maintains its gas gathering eyatem in Nueoes Count7, oao unit o? whioh orossee a pub- 110 road in satd oounty at a point between lta wel.b~end the plaoa OS dollvory to the pipe linr or the City or Corpus Ohrirti. Ths pipe llns referred to In this unit was aoastruotsdaubro- quent to the oonatruotlonOS said road. Another portion of the gathering a7stam of this aawn orossss Bate Highway No. 9, which was ooartruoted subsequentto the aonstruotionby Rspublio Nat- ural Gas Company OS Its said line. "Plea8s advise ua whether or not RepubUo Natural Gas Oompany la a public utility or utll- lty within the msahlng OS Artlale dOb0 ihso?ar aa the jurhdiotlon of the P&lrctad Ocamlsslon OS Texas is oaafcrred in Aptiole 6056 and 6060.a Artlole 6060, Rsvlsad Civil Statutes of hxas, reads as Sollows vEvery gaa utility subjaot to the pro+i- alohs or this dubdlvlslonon or before the Slrst day o? January and quarterly tharaaStar,shall ill% with the Commisnlon a statement,dul7 verl- Sled as true and oor~eoC by the prasidant, treas- urer or general manager If a aompaay or oorpora- tlon, or by the owner OS one OS tha ii au in- dividual or oo-partnership,shoring ths gross reoaipts OS suah utility Surtho quarter next praoeding or for suah portion OS said quarterly period a8 such utility map have been aonduotlug any bumlmss, and at suoh t&ma shall pay lnta the State Tmasury.at Austin a sum e ual to ohs- Sourth of one par oent OS the groae Pnoome re- oalved Szwn all businooa done by It within thlr Eonorable Clinton Cwsley, Rage 3 State during said quarter.” This hrtiole waa repealed la part by Seotion 10 oi Rouse Dill No. 547, of the Forty-aeoondLeglelature (Acts 1931, 42nd Leg., Regular Session, Ch. 73, p. 111). Seotlon lo or said bill provideal That Artiole 6000 of the Revlaed Civil Statutes 0S 1923, exaept iaaoiar as It lmpoasa a lloenae See or tar a? one-fourthof one per oent agalnat person8 owning, 0 orating, or men- aging pipe lines, as yrovlded f: n Seotlon 2 of Article 6030, is hereby repealed and raid fund shall be used for eniorolng the provlaiona OS Artlolee 6050 to 6066, lnalua1ve.v Therefore, aa Artlole 6060, aupra, aa smended, applies only to thoee pornona owning, operating,or wing pipe linea as provided in Ssotlon 2 OS Artlole 6OSC, we must now detennlne whether the operationsof the Republlo Natural. CatvCompany bring It within the pr0~1810n8 of ,SjaOtlOa8 O? Artiols 6050. Seotlon E OS Artlale 6060, aupra, reads aa SoUowal the term *gas utlllty* and 'publla ntll- lty* or lutlllty,laa used in thia l ubdlvialan, mean8 and lnaludea peraonr, oompanlea and prl- rate corporationa,their leeaeea, truateea,and reoelvera,owning, managing, operating,leasing or aontrollingwithin this abate any wella, pipe linea, plant, property, equipment,Saoility, Sranohlae, lloenae, or permit for either one or more 0s the r0iiwhg kladr 0s bualneaar ". . . "2. Cwnlng or operating or managing a pipe line Sor the transportationor oarrlage OS net- ural &as, whether for vublio hire orn~tiai;e",F part of the right OS nay SQX raid 11 h aoquired or may hereaSter be loqulred by th8 8x- eralee or the right oS eminent domain; or if aald , right of way of any railroad or other ]jublio Honorable Clinton Owsley, "age 4 utilltyg inaludihg also a09 natural gas utility authorized by law to exerolsa the right of bm- lnent dceoain. " (Emphasisours) You state in your letter that the Republic I&$- ural Gas Company 0~18, operates and maintains Its pipe line gatherl~ system, one unit OS whioh orossss a puhlio road in Nueoeo County at a point between its wells and the place or delivery on It8 lease to the pipe line or the City or Corpus Christl. This unit was oonstrwtsd subsequentto ths oonstruotion of the mad. Another unit aronses a Stats highway whioh was oonstruatedsubsequentto the oonrtruotion or ths pipe liner From the underaooredpart of the abow q~uotsd statute, It is apparent that thass operationsbring tha campan wlthln the tsrms OS Sootion 8 i.Sthe gathering sy8tem 28 a pipe line as used in ma motion. The oa8e of Williams v. Stats, 109 9. W. (8d) 489, lnvolvodthe oilen8e of unlawfully tapping a pipe line under xrtlole llllb OS Vernon*8 Penal Cods. 310 Court of Criminal &3Xd8 had ths iollowiag to 8a9 of the term pipe liner '1.. . The term pipe llns ha8 a ~6110 under8toodmeaning and iS oumodly under8taod a8 a mOU18 by whloh water, ga6, 011, or athor liquld8 am oonveyed Srom one plaae to another.* Without doubt this dofinltlonvmulild Cover tha gathering 89Sta& -ever, we are oonvinoad from ths very wortllng or the 8tatuto itseli that it IIS the lagi8lativa intant that gatherIn& srystempipe lines were to be lnsludad. 'Ihestatute provides speolrioallpvwhother ror publia hln or not.” Thi8 olssrly tidloaterr that private pipe llms are included if the Other oondition8are prasont. lhe ilutaut 8ituationis olaarly dirrtingulahabla rrox that involvad in the oese or Col-Ik~sx!:ReSlnlng Co. v. Hart, et al., 14,4S. Y. ted) 909 (W.E. Rer.). In that oase the ooapeny sought an injunotionagainst oertaln oSrfoial8 to re8train thsm frostsolleatfng an intangible tax lmposad by virtue oS Article 7105, Vernon18 Annotated Olvil Statutes. In oonneotionwith its rsSiner9 the oompany had a pipe line Ronorablo Olinton 0~81ey, Page 5 whioh it used axolusivel9 to transport 011 that It pur- chased Srom vsrious producersto the reiinery. The only question to bn deoided was whsther Artiols 7105 applied to thie type 0r pipe line. &tiOlO 9105 mad8 in part %8 fO11m8t YEaoh inoorporatedrailroad oompany, ferry company, bridge oompany, turnpikeor toll oom- pany, oil PIPeiline ooplpan9. and sll oommon Oarder PiRa line OOmDadeS Of every charaoter whatsooever, engaged in tha transportationoS 011, doing burrlne8s wholly or in part within this State, whether inoorporatsdtier tha laws OS this State, or 68 any other State territory, or SorelRn oountrs. and every other InUlr1dua.l. company,-oorporaticjn or aaso6lation do1 ne88 OS the 8ame oharaoter In this addition to the ad valorem tuw on tan&ble properties whioh am or may bs imposed &on them rsspeotfvely,by law, shall p&y an annual tu to the State, beglnniq with the rir8t day OS January OS each year on their Intangibleassats and property, . . .“[%pkm8iB OUr8) The oourt found thst tha oos~panywas neither an incorporated oil pipa line oclapanynor a common oarrier 011 pips line oompany, atad that, theretora, Sor tha tax to be proper the oompany would have to be Voing businssr oS tha satm oharaoter." The oourt held slnoe an oll pipa line oompany and a donwon aarrler ql%;‘pipaline oampany would oarry on the traxwportationOf oil a8 a bu8ins88 and prs- sumptivalpSnr hlrs that,tho transportationOS its own oil by the ooapsgt~ its refineryWa8 not bUsine8s of the same oharaoter. , the oompany was not liable foor the tax. Ye quote fforath3 OPbiOn Of ths OOIWt SS fOuOW8: ". . . In the Stret plaoe, evsry such 'In- dividual, oorporation,*etc., would have to be engage4 in business within the State and that business would have to bs oS t&s sums ohsrao- ter as thet being done by the incorporatedpipe line oampany, oarrisr, etc., that is, engaged in the transporationOS oil a8 a busllurss, and preiwmptfvelySor hire. . .. IO ths u8b it made oS its gathering system the raSinsry in no sense Htmorabla GXinton G~nley, Pac?e5 of the word wa8 doing the 'same oharaoter OS bU8ineSS’ as that referred to by suoh language in Art. 7105. . . * This argument doea not apply to the presrnt situation at all 8ihoe Seotion e or iirtiole6050 orpress- 19 provides vwhother ior pub110 hire or not," which aleer- 19 lndloates that private pipe lines am to be lnoludod within the terns 0r uld seot%on. 'jze quote Surther Srom the opinion In the Col- Ten ease: "Further,wherever the queltlon or purely $rlvate pipe lineo, limited In use to reSInerie of their ownere, have been dealt with by legir- latlon, auoh pipe line8 have been eroepted rrom the operation oS the law in it8 primary purposr and objeat. In other wWrQ8, the legislation is 8pecrifiothat 8uoh private pipe lines were never inoluded in it8 ten&m. Evidently the Leginla- ture had in mind krte. 6018 and 1503 when it amended Art. TlO5. . .* Suoh le not the oaae here. Instead OS eraoptillg private pipe l%m8, the bgi8lature by insorting -ether Sor public hire or not" &early lndioated that prlvat8 pipe line8 were to bs inoluded. be deem it proper to ad4 atthi8 point that we do not regard the oa8e OS Humble 011 & +?aIAiDg Company, et el v. Railroad Oommlssion0r Taxas, et al l..SSTax. lP5, 155 S. t?.(nd) 9, a8 controllingor even appiloable to the situationet hand. We quote from the oplnlon OS the oourt as rO11OW8t ”. . .In other words, Sor this order to be surtainsd, it must be because o&e?&as utll- it9 8tatUti6 &UthOdSS the OOmillI9iOn t0 fir the prioe at whioh s mers produoer thereoi must sell his produot to a publio gas utility, even though suoh produot is sold by the produeer at the point or origin, and even thou& suah pro- ducer doe8 not transport such aas On, Qvsr. or aoross the publio highWs98 OS thi8 Stats, em Honorsbla UinP;on Ov6lep, Pe@e 7 axnrolse the right of eminent Qwfaln ia regard thereto, or sell ths ema, or offer it fm aale, to the publfo germrally; but merely sells, under eontraut, to on6 purohesmr, who ie a pub1.h gas uti1:ty. . .- (kLpheeieours) Thus, it &e soon that the oourt was dealllrgwith the j~l8dlutl@n af thm Ullroed Coar.lesionto fir ret88 where the gee wee not truaeported ,,%m, over, or &omee the pub118 hi,#mye of tbie Wets. n Yueh am not tha iaote he~re. It toll.cmeirbm what we hmr said tkm omratioae or the :?epubliaNatural Oar t?wgmny bring ft within the pro- visions ot Eeotion 8 of 4+fele 0080. Ihe ooprpanlr 18, there- ftxce,lleble for the tax Sapwed by AFolale 6060. Article 6086, F%evilwaCiVll Btac~tse oi Texar, rea48 88 ?ol1a01 aThe Gosfabeion may requln o? rll persons or wrporetiesa opcrrating, owning OF oantrcbllbg eueh a pipe liner ewora report8 of the tatal quua tr tfee ot (o&a dirtributsd bg swh 9%9e llrme en6 6f the h614 by them in ,tcmge, an4 il8v ai their eoum* of aqtply, the nwbrr of aella imm whioh they draw tholr upply, the Mmnt af pree- sure nwdntdnwl, end th8 amount anb bher8~tbr end deeorlptfon of the lqufpilunt emplosed, and awh oc&er ~ttaxs pcr8alnlag fo the bumins sethe Gc6sai88lOn uy aem prtlmnt** thasr this statute the w*paay mwt al8o meke the annual reports required~by the C"awledM. 15 tirw of the fongdtg it is the oone%dared ogln- ion of thl6 departmeat that tb Republia H$wel Oar @aqmaY must pay the tax irqpoeed by Astlole 6060 * c. s., an4 must file the mumit reports reqtited by the ba~ir+Nkil Oapaat86iOn under &tiole &X%3, 'i.C. P. Vl?DJUL 11, 19 1 A - ATTORNEY GENERAL iwE ILli5