Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICEOFTHEATTORNEY GENERALOFTEXAs AUSTIN @I(LYP c.WINN .Vl---- In ywr latter 0 JMLNJJ5itCOW the rolloang contraat OUT1 by “A, n@nt,* aad oontr6ot Barrier pemllt inem thusoontnrotedfor. our opltdon(LBtu whether be of the aharaoter eat out b, V%ZTLOI&'SCiYil &t6tUtUS, 06&6tkrg 0116, *0+1dSS for th6 f8lJWUkO6 Of both 04ldW 66rtifiO8t66 Of 003lV6lltOli66 SiXid ot oarrierpemlta. sarotlon19 thereal viMoh 6n applioatloa SW ofxwun 66rti6r ri&te rJUBt O&d.& 6ttiCSUOtitM b(b) gf~& tit3 fIiOCf# d11Oh m-t b6 rhoun ln 6n appliostlon for 8 QontFaat oarrlerperaitr tithout UndQ t0 60 t&O d6tnil.e it ill ~UtfiO~'%Att0 note that nnt for a 4ortifioatrauthorielng a oomaon carrier operation is faoed with a owiid6&?Xbly hUavf6r bwdsn thnn is th8 ixi:plt6antfor a otmtraot 66~'3ier pWmit. Turther- ame, it my b6 observed that the holder ca$0 ourtifieats of conv65ieno~aribneeeeolty88 4 oam10n Barrier motoroamrisr enjo s braadur prltll6ges than dear the holdsr of 'Ihe Ea tter does not havs th%,rrtf&t t6 66ZT6 th6 Glenn 8. L6wl.s Asalatsnt