Calloway, E. v. Rudenstein, D.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT EDMOND CALLOWAY, : No. 49 EM 2017 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : DAVID RUDENSTEIN, : : Respondent : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282, 293 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid representation is not permissible). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.