Opinion issued November 7, 2019
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-19-00749-CV
———————————
IN RE RENEE MALTZ, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Renee Maltz, filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting this
Court to compel the respondent district judge to rule on motions to dismiss filed by
real parties in interest and relator’s motion for extension in the underlying trial court
proceeding.1 A week later, relator filed a motion to dismiss this original proceeding
1
The underlying proceeding is Renee Maltz v. One Stop Healthcare, 1 Stop Health
Care Services, LLC, The Methodist Hospital, and The Methodist Health Care
System, Cause No. 2017-85716, the Honorable Ursula A. Hall presiding.
because the trial court entered an order ruling on all of the motions at issue in this
proceeding.
Because respondent has ruled on relator’s pending motions, relator’s petition
is moot and this Court no longer has jurisdiction to grant relief. See Tex. A&M
Univ.–Kingsville v. Yarbrough, 347 S.W.3d 289, 290–91 (Tex. 2011); In re Dash,
No. 01-18-00350-CV, 2018 WL 3580944, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]
July 26, 2018, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op.).
Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for want of jurisdiction as moot. We
dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Goodman, and Countiss.
2