United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 23, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-50734
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PEDRO ALEJANDRO ANCHONDO,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
(3:05-CR-2757-1)
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Pedro Alejandro Anchondo pleaded guilty to one charge of bank
robbery and was sentenced to 151 months in prison. He contends his
sentence is unreasonable because it was more harsh than his co-
defendant’s and exceeds the sentencing aims of 18 U.S.C. § 3553.
Anchondo’s parity argument is unavailing. See United States
v. Duhon, 440 F.3d 711, 721 (5th Cir. 2006) (“the need to avoid
disparity ... [concerns] similarly-situated defendants nationwide
rather than disparity with [Anchondo’s] differently-situated
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
codefendant”), petition for cert. filed (18 May 2006) (No. 05-
11144). Considering Anchondo’s sentence was at the bottom of the
career-offender guideline’s range, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, he fails to
show it was unreasonable under § 3553. See United States v.
Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006).
AFFIRMED
2