Judgment reversed upon the law and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The court committed error in ruling upon the evidence at foUos 109, 122, 163. One ruHng (Fol. 109) resulted in injecting into the case irrelevant prejudicial matter which aggravated the effect of counsel’s statements of Hke character in the opening (Fol. 35). Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, CarsweU and Scudder, JJ., concur.