IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ALI SHAHROKHI, No. 84043
Petitioner,
vs.
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED
CLARK; THE HONORABLE DAWN
THRONE, DISTRICT JUDGE; AND JAN 1 0 2022
THE HONORABLE LINDA MARIE ELIZABER1 A. BROWN
BELL, CHIEF JUDGE, CLERK QF SUPREME COURT
BY .ql
Respondents, PUTYCiri RK r
and
KIZZY BURROW,
Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION
This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus or
prohibition challenges, for the second time, see Docket No. 83558, a
September 29, 2021, district court order denying petitioner's motion to
disqualify Judge Dawn Throne.
Having reviewed the petition and supporting documentation,'
we are not convinced that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention
is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88
P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the
burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist.
1 We have reviewed the documents attached to petitioner's emergency
motion for stay, but no appendix was filed with the writ petition.
Petitioner's failure to comply with NRAP 21(a)(4) constitutes an additional
basis on which to deny relief.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
4(11 I947A (4541P=4
,2407,0ogo.5
Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (recognizing that writ
relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in
determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.2
1 /4.1e.6,, ) J.
Silver
0,
J.
Cadish
cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, Chief Judge
Hon. Dawn Throne, District Judge, Family Court Division
Ali Shahrokhi
Kizzy Burrow
Eighth District Court Clerk
2In light of this order, petitioner's emergency motion for stay is denied
as moot.
2