UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
MICAH ANDERSON, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 22-1195 (UNA)
)
EVE KLINDERA REED, et al., )
)
Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Under the statute governing in forma pauperis proceedings, the Court is required to
dismiss a case “at any time” it determines that the action is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a
claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Here, having reviewed the
complaint carefully, the Court cannot discern what claim or claims plaintiff intends to bring; the
complaint will thus be dismissed. See Gwinnell-Kennedy v. U.S. Gov’t Judiciary, No. 09-cv-
737, 2009 WL 1089543, at *1 (D.D.C. Apr. 22, 2009) (summarily dismissing complaint under §
1915(e)(2) because it was “incoherent”); McGuire v. U.S. District Court, No. 10-cv-696, 2010
WL 1855858, at *1 (D.D.C. May 4, 2010) (summarily dismissing complaint under § 1915(e)(2)
because it was “largely incoherent and nonsensical”); cf. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325
(1989) (“[A] complaint, containing . . . . factual allegations and legal conclusions . . . lack[ing]
an arguable basis either in law or in fact” shall be dismissed.). In addition, the Court will grant
plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and deny his motion for preliminary
injunction as moot. A separate order will issue.
2022.05.06
DATE: May 6, 2022 14:53:37 -04'00'
_________________________
TREVOR N. McFADDEN
United States District Judge