Piegts v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butchers' Workmen of North America, Local Union No. 437

McCALEB, Justice

(concurring).

I subscribe to the majority view. I am also of the opinion that, should the employer appoint the Union as his sole and exclusive bargaining agent with respect to wages, hours of labor and working conditions, it would virtually establish in favor of said Union “an employment monopoly” of the business in violation of Section 2 of Act 252 of 1954 and against the declared public policy of this State.