State v. D.E.R.

PER CURIAM.

Based upon our conclusion that the record evidence fully supports the trial court’s finding that the police lacked reasonable suspicion to conduct a pat down search of the appellee/juvenile, we affirm the order granting the motion to suppress. See Ray v. State, 849 So.2d 1222 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Coleman v. State, 723 So.2d 387 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); E.H. v. State, 593 So.2d 243 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

Affirmed.