FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 19 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ERICA LEON-DE JIMENEZ, No. 10-72101
Petitioner, Agency No. A098-920-133
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 17, 2012 **
Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Erica Leon-De Jimenez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen.
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the
denial of a motion to reopen, Garcia v. Holder, 621 F.3d 906, 912 (9th Cir. 2010),
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Leon-De Jimenez’s motion
to reopen on the ground that the evidence she submitted regarding her daughter’s
depression and medical condition, and her father’s medical condition, was
insufficient to establish prima facie eligibility for cancellation of removal. See id.
(prima facie eligibility is demonstrated by a showing that there is a reasonable
likelihood that the statutory requirements for relief have been satisfied); Singh v.
INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002) (BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall
be reversed only if it is “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law.”).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.