Smith v. New York Times Co

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1795 SAMUEL L. SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, a New York Corpora- tion; THE SPARTANBURG HERALD-JOURNAL, a South Carolina Corporation, Defendants - Appellees, and MIKE TOWERY; EARL BARBER, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-2300-7-20AK) Submitted: October 20, 1997 Decided: November 12, 1997 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel L. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Bernard Lindemann, JACKSON, LEWIS, SCHNITZLER & KRUPMAN, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Appel- lees' motion for costs associated with defending against Appel- lant's employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. New York Times Co, et al, No. CA-94-2300-7-20AK (D.S.C. May 19, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2