UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7855
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
EMMANUEL ODEMENA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
(CR-91-305, CA-97-1919-HAR)
Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 21, 1998
Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Emmanuel Odemena, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Reeves Harding, Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Emmanuel Odemena appeals two district court orders, the first
denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &
Supp. 1998), and the second denying his motion for extension of
time to file a motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil-
ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
United States v. Odemena, Nos. CR-91-305, CA-97-1919-HAR (D. Md.
Nov. 5, 1997 and Dec. 4, 1997). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.
DISMISSED
2