Henson v. Jones

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7630 GEORGE HENSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PAM JONES; KEITH WALDROP, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-1272-AM) Submitted: February 23, 1999 Decided: May 4, 1999 Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Henson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Henson v. Jones, No. CA-98-1272-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 1, 1998). We deny Appellant’s motion for the appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2