Nevius v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-3255 ___________________________ Bryon B. Nevius lllllllllllllllllllllAppellant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service lllllllllllllllllllllAppellee ____________ Appeal from The United States Tax Court ____________ Submitted: July 6, 2017 Filed: July 27, 2017 [Unpublished] ____________ Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Bryon Nevius appeals a decision of the tax court,1 which dismissed his petition challenging a notice of deficiency issued by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and upheld the assessments set forth in the notice of deficiency. The Commissioner 1 The Honorable Michael B. Thornton, Chief Judge, United States Tax Court. urges affirmance, and has moved for sanctions on appeal. Having jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1), this court affirms. After careful review, this court concludes that the tax court properly dismissed the petition, as courts have repeatedly rejected Nevius’s boilerplate tax-protester arguments. See Campbell v. Comm’r, 164 F.3d 1140, 1142 (8th Cir. 1999) (standards of review for tax court decisions); Shenker v. Comm’r, 804 F.2d 109, 114 n. 6 (8th Cir. 1986) (courts have uniformly upheld the constitutionality of the tax court); United States v. Jagim, 978 F.2d 1032, 1036 (8th Cir. 1992) (rejecting defendant’s argument--that he was citizen of Republic of Idaho, and therefore not subject to federal income tax--as “completely without merit, [and] patently frivolous”). Finally, this court may award “just damages” and single or double costs if it determines that an appeal is frivolous. 28 U.S.C. § 1912; Fed. R. App. P. 38. In this case, sanctions are appropriate. See United States v. Gerads, 999 F.2d 1255, 1256-57 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam) (rejecting the argument that “Free Citizens of the Republic of Minnesota” were not subject to taxation; granting government’s motion for sanctions for frivolous appeal). The judgment is affirmed, and this court grants the Commissioner’s motion for sanctions in the amount of $5,000. ______________________________ -2-