Analyzing search results...
Relevance: 100.0% · 94 N.E. 1080 · 5 citing cases · Filed on: 1911-04-07, New York Court of Appeals

The court opinion in "Reich v. Cochran" from the New York Court of Appeals is highly relevant to the treatment of the case you are researching, as it directly addresses the legal proceedings between the same parties and the implications of prior judgments on subsequent actions. The opinion discusses the validity of a summary proceeding initiated by Cochran against Reich, emphasizing the sufficiency of the petition in establishing jurisdiction based on the statutory requirements. It also reaffirms the principle that a prior adjudication serves as a conclusive bar to subsequent actions, which is central to understanding the legal context and outcomes of the Reich v. Cochran case. This analysis provides critical insights into the legal principles at play and the procedural history that may impact your research.

Relevance: 100.0% · 257 B.R. 394 · 25 citing cases · Filed on: 2001-01-04, United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York

Analyzing...

Relevance: 100.0% · 451 F.2d 202 · 12 citing cases · Filed on: 1971-11-03, Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

The court opinion in George Velazquez v. Edward Thompson is relevant to your research on Reich v. Cochran, 94 N.E. 1080 as it discusses the historical context and legal framework of summary eviction procedures in New York, which were established in part by the precedent set in Reich v. Cochran. The opinion cites Reich to illustrate the long-standing recognition of summary proceedings as a means for landlords to regain possession of property efficiently, thereby providing insight into the legal principles that underpin current eviction laws. Furthermore, the court's analysis of constitutional challenges to these procedures may inform your understanding of how Reich v. Cochran has influenced subsequent interpretations of due process in eviction cases.

Show 1 more documents
Searched case law and statutes
  • Searching by citations: 94 N.E. 1080

  • Searching for references to: 94 N.E. 1080

Found 4 relevant documents

Decided to search case law and statutes
Thought about how to answer your question

To research the treatment of Reich v. Cochran, 94 N.E. 1080, follow these steps using Cetient:

  1. Case Retrieval:

    • Search for "Reich v. Cochran" with the citation "94 N.E. 1080" to access the full text.
  2. Analyze Holdings:

    • Review the court’s decision, key rulings, and legal principles established.
  3. Subsequent Citations:

    • Use the citation analysis tool to find how later cases have cited Reich v. Cochran.
    • Identify if it's been upheld, overruled, or distinguished in subsequent rulings.
  4. Legal Commentary:

    • Look for journal articles or legal commentaries discussing the case's impact and treatment.
  5. Jurisdictional Relevance:

    • Ensure the treatment is relevant within the applicable jurisdiction for your research.
  6. Shepardize/KeyCite:

    • Utilize citation services to verify the current standing and any negative treatment by higher courts.

This approach ensures a comprehensive understanding of how Reich v. Cochran has been treated in case law.

Check treatment of "Reich v. . Cochran, 94 N.E. 1080"

Cetient is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Cetient can make mistakes. Check important info.