UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7114
LEONARD CARTER, JR.
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
GREGORY HARRIS; A. PRICE; CURTIS B. WILLIAMS;
FRANK BROWN; LEMUEL WASHINGTON; VINCENT JAMES;
JAMES SELBY; THOMAS LOUIS DALE, JR.; LINELL R.
JONES; RALPH HAIRSTONE; DEMETRIS ODOM,
Plaintiffs,
versus
RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director; A. D. ROBINSON,
Warden; JOHN P. ALDERMAN, Chairman; P. W. BUCK
ROGERS, Director; E. MONTGOMERY TUCKER, Former
Chairman; JOHN B. METZER, III, Former Chair-
man; M. L. HILL, Operation Officer,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (CA-99-112)
Submitted: October 21, 1999 Decided: October 27, 1999
Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leonard Carter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
Leonard Carter appeals from a district court order dismissing
without prejudice his complaint alleging civil rights violations
under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999). The court dismissed
Carter’s complaint because he failed to pay his filing fee as
directed or otherwise aver that he could not pay such a fee. Be-
cause Carter may proceed with this action in the district court by
amending his complaint to provide the information requested by the
court, his appeal is interlocutory and not subject to appellate
review. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,
10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Carter’s motions to ap-
point counsel, to produce documents, to proceed in forma pauperis,
for summary judgment, and “for trial by jury.” We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3