UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6789
JOSEPH FREDERICK MOORE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
H. R. POWELL, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-97-595)
Submitted: October 29, 1999 Decided: December 17, 1999
Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Frederick Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assis-
tant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Richard Cullen, MCGUIRE,
WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Frederick Moore, a Virginia inmate, appeals from the
district court's order denying his motion to reopen the proceedings
relating to his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994
& Supp. 1999). The district court dismissed the motion as frivo-
lous. Although Moore styled his motion as one to reopen § 2254
proceedings, there is no provision in the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure or the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases for such a motion.
To the extent that the motion to reopen may be construed as one
filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), we have reviewed the record and
have considered Moore's claims on appeal and find no abuse of
discretion in the district court's denial of relief. See Heyman v.
M.L. Mktg. Co., 116 F.3d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1997) (stating standard
of review for Rule 60(b) motion). Accordingly, we deny a certif-
icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2