UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6483
CHARLES RICHARD RILEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
A. D. MATHEWS, SR., Sheriff; EARL MULLINS,
Internal Affairs; NANCY JUSTICE, Classifica-
tion; TROY FISHER, Deputy Sheriff; W. LAS-
SITER, Classification; ELLEN HOLT, Lieutenant;
DEPUTY SHERIFF JESSIE; DEPUTY SHERIFF TABB; B.
MALLORY, Deputy Sheriff; DEPUTY SHERIFF COLEY;
RONALD REDFORD, Deputy Sheriff; DEPUTY SHERIFF
HURT; UNKNOWN DEPUTIES, Deputy Sheriff; UN-
KNOWN MEDICAL PERSONNEL, Jail Medical; UNKNOWN
CLASSIFICATION PERSONNEL, Classification,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Barry R. Poretz, Magistrate
Judge. (CA-98-94-AM)
Submitted: October 29, 1999 Decided: December 20, 1999
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Richard Riley, Appellant Pro Se. William Kerfoot Lewis,
BEALE, BALFOUR, DAVIDSON, ETHERINGTON & PARKER, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Charles Richard Riley appeals the magistrate judge’s order de-
nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint
after a trial.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate
judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Riley v.
Mathews, No. CA-98-94-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 26, 1999). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate
judge over this civil action. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).
2
Riley v. Mathews
Combined Opinion