UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7054
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JAMES E. CARR,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-93-66-N)
Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 14, 2000
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James E. Carr, Appellant Pro Se. Carol M. Marx, Special Assistant
United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
James E. Carr seeks to appeal the district court’s orders de-
nying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. See United States v. Carr, No. CR-93-66-N (E.D. Va.
Sept. 24, July 10, 1998 and July 15, 1999). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process. We also deny Carr’s motions to appoint
counsel, to authorize preparation of a transcript at government
expense, and to amend his informal brief.
DISMISSED
2