UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7310
LARRY MEYER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GEORGE M. HINKLE, Warden,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.
(CA-99-173-2)
Submitted: February 29, 2000 Decided: March 27, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Meyer, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Larry Meyer appeals the district court's orders denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint, and the
district court’s order denying both his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) mo-
tion for reconsideration and his motion to amend. However, because
the sole issue Meyer raised in his informal brief relates to the
district court’s denial of his motion to amend, we have limited our
review to that issue. See Local Rule 34(b). We have reviewed the
record and the district court's opinion relating to the denial of
Meyer’s motion to amend and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Meyer v. Hinkle,
No. CA-99-173-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 1999). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2