UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7346
ALBERT CURTIS MILLS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LIEUTENANT BRICE; SERGEANT HASKINS; SERGEANT
STATEN; OFFICER PUGH; OFFICER ROBINSON; CAP-
TAIN CHAMBERS; NURSE SARBENG,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 00-6022
ALBERT CURTIS MILLS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LIEUTENANT BRICE; SERGEANT HASKINS; SERGEANT
STATEN; OFFICER PUGH; OFFICER ROBINSON; CAP-
TAIN CHAMBERS; NURSE SARBENG,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
99-25-DKC)
Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 19, 2000
Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Albert Curtis Mills, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, David Phelps Kennedy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Albert Curtis Mills appeals the district court’s orders deny-
ing relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint
and denying his motion for injunctive relief. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Mills v. Brice, No. CA-99-25-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 26 & Nov.
30, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2