UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6085
GRADY EDWARD LLOYD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;
PERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; DOCTOR
EDWARDS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-99-1787-4-18BF)
Submitted: April 27, 2000 Decided: May 4, 2000
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Grady Edward Floyd, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, BURNS,
MCDONALD, BRADFORD, PATRICK & TINSLEY, Greenwood, South Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Grady Edward Lloyd appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Lloyd v. South Carolina Dep’t of Correc-
tions, No. CA-99-1787-4-18BF (D.S.C. Dec. 13, 1999). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2