Fleming v. Slick

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2660 STEVEN PAUL FLEMING, ATP, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANN SLICK, Ms., Defendant - Appellee, and MARYLAND COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-99- 1619-MJG) Submitted: April 27, 2000 Decided: May 2, 2000 Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven Paul Fleming, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Susan Howe Baron, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Steven Paul Fleming appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Fleming v. Slick, No. CA-99-1619-MJG (D. Md. Nov. 29, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on November 9, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on November 29, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2