UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7579
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
SIMON CHOW,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-94-219, CA-96-1641-AM)
Submitted: April 10, 2000 Decided: May 1, 2000
Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Simon Chow, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant
United States Attorney, William Neil Hammerstrom, Jr., OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Simon Chow seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying
his motion for relief from the court’s order denying his motion
filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no abuse of
discretion in the denial of the motion. See National Org. for
Women v. Operation Rescue, 47 F.3d 667, 669 (4th Cir. 1995). Chow
did not establish any extraordinary circumstances warranting relief
under Rule 60(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. See Ackermann v. United States,
340 U.S. 193, 202 (1950). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argu-
ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre-
sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2