UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6427
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RONALD MAURICE WOODS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CR-95-7, CA-98-18-7)
Submitted: June 15, 2000 Decided: June 23, 2000
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Maurice Woods, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall Ramseyer,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Maurice Woods appeals the district court’s orders deny-
ing his motions filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 and 60. He claims
on appeal that he is entitled to relief because he raised his claim
related to the sufficiency of his indictment in his prior motion
filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See United States
v. Woods, Nos. CR-95-7; CA-98-18-7 (W.D. Va. Feb. 16, 2000); see
also United States v. Williams, 674 F.2d 310, 313 (4th Cir. 1982)
(holding that relief is not authorized where the Rule 60(b) motion
is “nothing more than a request that the district court change its
mind”). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2