UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6189
WILLIAM A. FISHER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
L. WHITE, Guard; BERLIN, Guard; HOLLOWOOD,
Guard; CARTY, Guard,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
MR. ANGALO, Surgeon,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-99-199-3)
Submitted: June 15, 2000 Decided: June 22, 2000
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William A. Fisher, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Leonard Taylor, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
William Fisher appeals the dismissal without prejudice of his
pro se 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. Fisher's
complaint was dismissed for failure to comply with the district
court's orders requiring that he comply with basic filing require-
ments. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). Because Fisher
may be able to save this action by particularizing his complaint in
compliance with the district court's orders, the order which Fisher
seeks to appeal is not an appealable final order. See Domino Sugar
Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064 (1993). Ac-
cordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2