UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6539
HERBERT CURTIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MRS. JOHNSON, Warden; FLORENCE MAUNEY, Cap-
tain; MRS. GREW, Grievance; OFFICER BISHOP;
OFFICER OWENS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-99-220-6)
Submitted: June 15, 2000 Decided: June 26, 2000
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Herbert Curtis, Appellant Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr., CHAPMAN,
HARTER & GROVES, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Herbert Curtis appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint as frivolous.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find that this
appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. See Curtis v. Johnson, No. CA-99-
220-6 (D.S.C. Mar. 23, 2000). We further deny Curtis’ motion for
documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2