United States v. Williams

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6555 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DENNIS WILLIAMS, a/k/a Dennis Leonard, a/k/a Nushwill St. Albans Williams, a/k/a George Washington Barker, a/k/a Devon, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge; John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CR-89-104-HAR, CA-96- 2035-HAR) Submitted: August 10, 2000 Decided: August 25, 2000 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dennis Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Dennis Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal- ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Williams, Nos. CR-89-104-HAR; CA-96- 2035-HAR (D. Md. Mar. 24, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2