UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2675
LAUNEIL SANDERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GASTON COUNTY ADMINISTRATION GOVERNMENT; LAMB
LAW OFFICES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge; William M. Catoe, Jr., Magistrate Judge. (CA-99-3995)
Submitted: August 18, 2000 Decided: September 12, 2000
Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Launeil Sanders, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Launeil Sanders seeks to appeal a report of the magistrate
judge recommending that Sanders’s complaint be summarily dismissed.
Because this order was not a final judgment or otherwise appeal-
able, we dismiss his appeal from that order. Sanders filed another
notice of appeal from the district court’s order adopting the
report of the magistrate judge and summarily dismissing his com-
plaint. This is a final, appealable order. To the extent that
statements in the initial notice of appeal can be construed as
objections to the magistrate judge’s report, we have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate
judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See
Sanders v. Gaston County Admin. Govt., No. CA-99-3995 (D.S.C.
Dec. 10, 1999; April 7, 2000). We deny leave to proceed in forma
pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2